This article is from page 115 of the 2009-02-17 edition of The Clare People. OCR mistakes are to be expected so download the original SWF or the rendered page 115 JPG
AS the players ambled out of the dressing room in Casement Park on Saturday, there was an understanda- bly muted atmosphere. After all, this was a rather forgettable defeat but instead of being able to put it behind them, they still had the unenviable task of having to make the five hour trip home, where introspection and a post mortem were inevitable.
Clare selector James Hanrahan epitomised Clare’s disappointment and as he attempted to express his views on the night’s events, he cut a figure of frustration as to what went wrong.
“It’s hard to know. The way the game started, it opened up at a hun- dred miles an hour and there were chances at both ends. Our retention of the ball was very poor, we kept giving the ball away whereas Antrim made more use of their possession.
“Anytime they came down the field, they kind of punished us whereas we were going back up and giving the ball back to them. Our whole centre seemed to open up, our midfield was gone and our half-forward line were attacking and the next thing they were coming down and attacking in
WEN ohe
“So we are disappointed, we were very poor last week on the breaking ball and I though we improved that in the first half and the next thing, we went up the field and kept handing it back to Antrim.”
All that after Clare got an early boost with Steven Moloney’s op- portunistic goal after only forty sec- oy aTekse
“Well of course Antrim could have got the perfect start too, they missed a goal chance before we went back up and we got a good chance. The way the game opened up, it was end to end really, there was no marking, no defending, no nothing, it was just a pure open game. They made more use of their chances definitely but there was a lot of space.”
The Doora/Barefield man was open and frank in his appraisal of the per- formance but also questioned the logic of fixing the game for 7.30pm when an early throw-in time on Sun- day would have facilitated the play- ers better.
“We were five points down and we had a couple of chances to bring it back to three but we didn’t take them while every time that Antrim at- tacked, they seemed to score. As I
say, our ball retention was very poor, we kept handing ball back to them and most teams will punish you if you keep giving them enough ball. That’s the most disappointing part of it. Chances-wise, we ran out of steam and Antrim were way sharper, they were flying it but at the same time, we still had our chances.
‘The fitness levels of our lads, even from the McGrath Cup, especially late on were noticeable. Unless it was the travelling, they had a long day to- day and you would have to question having the game on at half seven of a Saturday evening.
“The team travelled up last night and it’s a long day waiting to play the game. We are travelling down to- night and it’s going to be a long night and you would have to question the wisdom of the game being played at this time. Sligo wouldn’t agree to play us last week in Cooraclare at half seven but I suppose if you look at the game, Antrim were the better team and were way sharper, their sideline was very good and they got some great scores.
“We just didn’t have the legs for
them and you can put that down to maybe a lack of fitness or you can put it down to maybe having to hang around all day waiting to play a game. They are only amateur players and arriving home at four o’clock in the morning, is that the right thing? If the game was fixed for one or two o’clock tomorrow, it would have been better but we are not making any excuses, the better team won on the day.”