This article is from page 4 of the 2011-08-23 edition of The Clare People. OCR mistakes are to be expected so download the original SWF or the rendered page 4 JPG
A RECOMMENDATION by councillors to include large tracts of development land as part of a proposed variation to the Ennis and Environs Development Plan has been described as a “haphazard approach to sequential planning”.
In July, members of Clare County Council and Ennis Town Council voted through a number of amendments to the proposed variation. At the time, councillors were told that phase one of the plan could only include 88 hectares of land zoned for residential purposes.
In total, across a number of amend- ments, members of Ennis Town Council proposed the inclusion of 38 hectares of land in the Ennis area, which the manager’s report said should be excluded from phase one of the variation. To balance their proposals, councillors also proposed that 38 hectares of land in the Roslevan area be excluded from Phase One of the variation.
Thirty-one submissions were received in relation to the variation, which was drawn up in response to concerns raised by the Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government. The Department had expressed concern over the amount of land zoned in the Ennis area. Reports and material amendments to the plan have now gone before the public.
In a strategic environmental assessment on proposed amendments to the plan, council planners state, “The zoned lands within Phase One as recommended by the Elected Members represent a segregated and haphazard approach to sequential planning.”
The report continues, “It is contrary to the aim of the core strategy which encourages sequential development from the centre out and this option has the potential to cause significant environmental effects including development in an ad-hoc and unrestrictive manner; without regard to the current available levels of infrastructure and utilities, without regard for environmental and ecological designations, sensitivities and constraints and without regard for the likely significant impacts on water resources
The report states that the majority of lands are located within the Clarecastle RDA “which currently has issues regarding the pressure on wastewater infrastructure”. The report adds, “It is also relevant to note that the Clarecastle RDA is not within the protection zone for Drumcliff springs. The allocation of phased lands within the Western RDA is within in the Drumcliff Inner Protection Zone.”
Members of the public have until September 9 to make submissions.